Why Blockchain Security is Critical

As the total value of assets on the blockchain exceeded $1 trillion in 2024, the urgency to combat blockchain-specific cyber threats has become more crucial than ever.

Latest analysis on cryptocurrency-related crime reveals a significant 65% reduction in illicit transaction volumes over the past year, as of mid-2023. However, as the blockchain landscape evolves, the strategies employed by cybercriminals are also becoming more sophisticated. In response, it is essential for organizations to implement a comprehensive security framework to succeed in this shifting environment.

The rapid expansion of decentralized technologies has spurred remarkable innovations, yet the decentralized nature also introduces specific challenges. Mirroring the early days of the Internet, it's becoming apparent that every institution will soon need a well-defined blockchain security strategy to protect their operations.

In this overview of blockchain security, we will examine the vulnerabilities and exploits that are prevalent in the cryptocurrency world, review various defensive measures, and consider the evolving landscape of on-chain security. This discussion aims to provide insights into securing digital assets and maintaining trust within the blockchain ecosystem.

What does blockchain security entail?

Blockchain security involves the integration of cybersecurity methodologies, tools, and best practices aimed at reducing risks and preventing unauthorized access and malicious attacks within blockchain networks.

Although all blockchains utilize distributed ledger technology (DLT), they differ in functionality and security levels. Public and private blockchains each offer unique benefits and face distinct challenges, primarily because of the fundamental differences in their network structures—open versus closed. These differences significantly influence their respective security frameworks.

Security in Public Blockchains

Public blockchains such as Bitcoin and Ethereum operate as open, permissionless networks where anyone can join and participate in transaction validation. The codebases of these public blockchains are open-source, meaning they are accessible to the public and constantly scrutinized by a community of developers. This community actively reviews the code to identify and resolve bugs, vulnerabilities, and other potential issues. The open-source nature not only fosters enhancement of security, features, and efficiency through collective expertise but also poses a risk, as it allows hackers and malicious actors to continuously search for and potentially exploit vulnerabilities.

Responsibility for Security in Public Blockchains

In public blockchains like Ethereum, the responsibility for security is collectively held by the entire network globally. This includes not only the original founders, who provide the initial source code and guide network development, but also validators and node operators who keep the network running smoothly. Moreover, the ecosystem is supported by hundreds of thousands of developers who continuously refine and enhance the code. Users also play a crucial role by adhering to best practices for security. Given the decentralized nature of public blockchains, no single entity holds total control over security, enhancing the network's resilience against various attacks.

Ongoing Maintenance and Development of Public Blockchains

Public blockchains often benefit from associated entities that focus on development and fostering community engagement. For instance, the Ethereum Foundation actively supports Ethereum's development, whereas Bitcoin, initiated by the pseudonymous Satoshi Nakamoto, is maintained by a dedicated group of developers who manage the Bitcoin Core software. This software is dynamic, requiring continual updates and maintenance to fix vulnerabilities and respond to emerging challenges. Changes to the network are governed by a consensus mechanism. In Bitcoin's case, changes are proposed through Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs), which anyone can submit, not just the core maintainers, promoting a democratic process for network evolution.

Security in Private Blockchains

Private blockchains operate as exclusive networks with restricted access, making them inherently more centralized compared to their public counterparts. This centralization can enhance resistance to certain external threats, but it also introduces a single point of failure. Consequently, securing a private blockchain is primarily the responsibility of the specific entity that manages the network. It is imperative for this institution to implement robust security measures to mitigate vulnerabilities inherent in centralized systems.

While private blockchains do not benefit from the decentralized, security-by-numbers advantage seen in public blockchains, they often offer greater speed and efficiency. This is because they require less computational effort for achieving consensus. However, the central authority in private blockchains, which controls access and permissions, also holds the power to potentially shut down or manipulate the network. This presents a unique security risk not usually associated with public blockchains, where no single entity has overarching control. The balance between control and security in private blockchains necessitates stringent internal security protocols to protect against both internal and external threats.

Securing Blockchain Technology

Blockchain operates on a decentralized digital ledger system, composed of a global network of computers, known as nodes, that validate and record transactions. This setup ensures that there is no centralized authority or single point of failure, as each participant retains a copy of the entire ledger. Transactions, such as cryptocurrency transfers, are grouped into blocks which are then added to the blockchain.

Before a block is appended to the blockchain, it must be verified through a consensus mechanism. The two primary types of consensus mechanisms are Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS). In PoW, miners solve complex computational problems to validate transactions, whereas in PoS, validators lock up a portion of their tokens to earn the right to validate transactions. These validators, whether miners in PoW or stakers in PoS, are rewarded for their efforts in securing the network. This validation process ensures that all network participants agree on the legitimacy of transactions. Once a block is filled, it is cryptographically sealed and linked to the preceding block, forming an unbreakable chain. Due to the distributed nature of the ledger and cryptographic linking of blocks, tampering with any block would necessitate alterations across the entire chain, making fraud highly detectable and difficult.

Blockchain technology not only underpins popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum but also offers vast potential for revolutionizing digital transactions and establishing trust without intermediaries.

Security of Transactions on a Blockchain

In contrast to traditional financial systems that operate on permission-based fund withdrawals, blockchain transactions are initiated directly between peers without intermediaries. Each user manages their digital assets using a private key—a cryptographic tool that ensures secure access and transaction authentication.

In the realm of cryptocurrencies, personal responsibility is paramount since transactions are irreversible once confirmed on the blockchain. This immutability means that lost or stolen funds are nearly impossible to recover, highlighting the critical importance of secure management of private keys. This peer-to-peer transaction model not only enhances security by eliminating intermediary risks but also places a greater emphasis on the user’s vigilance and precautionary measures in safeguarding their digital assets.

Vulnerabilities and Security in Blockchain Technology

While blockchain is often touted as being inherently secure, it is not completely immune to security threats. However, its unique structural features significantly enhance its intrinsic security properties:

Cryptography: Blockchain transactions are secured using cryptographic principles, which ensure data integrity and authentication. The public key infrastructure (PKI) provides users with a public key for receiving assets and a private key for securing them.
Decentralization: Unlike centralized systems, blockchains are maintained across a dispersed network of computers, or nodes. This means that compromising a single node—or even several—does not jeopardize the entire system.
Consensus Mechanisms: These algorithms ensure that all nodes agree on the validity of transactions. Protocols like Proof-of-Work (PoW) and Proof-of-Stake (PoS) protect against Sybil attacks, where an attacker attempts to gain control of the majority of the network.
Immutability: Once a transaction is recorded in a block and added to the blockchain, it cannot be altered. This permanence ensures that transaction histories remain unchangeable.
Transparency: Many blockchains operate as public ledgers, allowing anyone to view any transaction, thus making any fraudulent activity more detectable.

Despite these robust security measures, vulnerabilities still exist. The same features that make blockchain revolutionary, like its immutability, can also pose risks if the system itself is ever compromised.

Types of Blockchain Security Breaches

Blockchain vulnerabilities can be categorized into three main types:

Ecosystem Vulnerabilities: These encompass flaws within the broader blockchain ecosystem, including issues with node configuration or network communications.
Smart Contract and Protocol Attacks: These target the additional layers that operate atop the blockchain, such as smart contracts and other protocols, which can contain exploitable bugs or design flaws.
Infrastructure and User Attacks: These focus on elements like digital wallets and exchange platforms, as well as user behavior, which can lead to stolen keys or phishing attacks.

It is crucial to understand that while blockchain provides several security advantages, it is not devoid of potential security challenges that require vigilant management and continuous enhancement.

Vulnerabilities in the Blockchain Ecosystem

A blockchain network with fewer nodes is inherently more vulnerable to attacks than one that is large and broadly distributed. Sybil attacks or 51% attacks are now significantly challenging to execute on well-established blockchains such as Bitcoin or Ethereum due to the immense computing power or substantial assets required. However, understanding the full range of potential risks is crucial, particularly for organizations considering the adoption of smaller, emerging blockchains or those looking to develop their own.

Sybil Attack

A Sybil attack targets the peer-to-peer layer of a blockchain network, where a malicious actor attempts to gain control over multiple nodes to influence network operations.

51% or Double-Spending Attack

This attack is a threat to the integrity of Proof-of-Work blockchains. If an attacker controls more than 50% of the network's mining power, they can manipulate transaction confirmations, enabling double-spending of coins and potentially halting the addition of new blocks.

Centralization Risks

Despite the decentralized ideals of public blockchains, practical aspects such as mining pools can lead to centralization. This concentration of power can introduce vulnerabilities. Moreover, many blockchain nodes operate on centralized cloud services, such as Amazon Web Services. An attack on such centralized infrastructure could compromise a significant portion of the nodes, pushing the network towards centralization and increasing its susceptibility to attacks.

Network Congestion

Blockchain network congestion happens when there are insufficient validators to process the volume of transactions being submitted. This can lead to transaction processing delays, increased transaction fees, and, in severe cases, network downtime and instability. Such issues can undermine trust in the network's capacity to handle high transaction volumes efficiently.

Understanding these vulnerabilities is essential for maintaining the security and efficiency of blockchain networks, especially as the technology continues to evolve and integrate into various sectors.

Vulnerabilities in Protocols and Smart Contracts on Blockchain Networks

Bridge Attacks

Blockchain bridges facilitate the transfer of assets between different blockchain networks, enhancing the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem. However, because they often hold large amounts of assets and can be less secure than the blockchains they connect, bridges have become prime targets for hackers. Notably, bridge attacks constitute approximately 70% of cryptocurrency-related cyber attacks, highlighting their vulnerability.

Layer 2 Vulnerabilities

General blockchain security concerns extend to Layer 2 solutions, with additional specific vulnerabilities. These include potential transaction censorship by rollup providers and attacks such as Denial of Service (DoS) and malware targeting these providers, which can disrupt the operations of these networks.

Protocol Hacks and Exploits

In the DeFi sector, protocol hacks are particularly troubling, leading to substantial financial losses and eroding trust in the ecosystem. Despite regular security audits intended to mitigate risks, the complexity of these financial protocols can allow vulnerabilities to remain undetected. A significant incident was the BadgerDAO hack, where a compromised Cloudflare API key enabled the theft of $120 million.

Other Smart Contract Vulnerabilities

Smart contracts are susceptible to coding errors that can be exploited maliciously. A historical instance of such a vulnerability was the DAO hack on Ethereum, where an attacker drained about a third of The DAO's funds, worth roughly $50 million at the time. This major security breach resulted in a divisive hard fork within the Ethereum community, ultimately leading to the split into Ethereum (ETH) and Ethereum Classic (ETC).

Security Threats to Infrastructure and Users in the Cryptocurrency Ecosystem

Popular Software Vulnerabilities

Cryptocurrency wallets and commonly used software are frequent targets of cyberattacks. A striking instance was the breach of a widely used Solana mobile wallet, Slope, where hackers managed to steal over $8 million in SOL. The attack was so significant that it initially raised concerns about the security of the Solana blockchain itself.

Centralized Exchange Hacks

Centralized cryptocurrency exchanges, which facilitate the trading of digital assets, are perennial targets for cybercriminals. The infamous Mt. Gox incident in 2014, where hackers stole approximately 850,000 bitcoins, underscores the potential vulnerabilities of these platforms.

Malware Attacks

Cyber attackers often deploy malware to steal wallet keys or execute unauthorized transactions. One sophisticated method involves malware that detects when a cryptocurrency address is copied to the clipboard and then swaps it with the attacker's address during pasting.

Phishing Attacks

In phishing scams, attackers deceive users into revealing sensitive information such as private keys or passwords. These schemes typically employ fake websites or messages that mimic legitimate sources to trick users.

SIM Swap Fraud

Using SMS for multi-factor authentication is risky due to the threat of SIM swap attacks. In these cases, attackers transfer a victim's SIM card details to their device, often by impersonating the victim to the service provider, thereby gaining control over accounts associated with the phone number.

Social Engineering Scams

These scams involve tricking individuals into sending cryptocurrency or revealing private keys and passwords under deceptive pretexts.

User Errors

Mistakes made by users, such as losing private keys, inadvertently sharing them, or sending assets to incorrect addresses, represent significant risks. However, these issues stem from user error rather than inherent flaws in blockchain technology.

Please note that Plisio also offers you:

Create Crypto Invoices in 2 Clicks and Accept Crypto Donations

12 integrations

6 libraries for the most popular programming languages

19 cryptocurrencies and 12 blockchains