Post-Mining Era: The Fate of Bitcoin After the Last Coin is Mined

Post-Mining Era: The Fate of Bitcoin After the Last Coin is Mined

Bitcoin is recognized as a deflationary asset due to its finite supply, capped at 21 million coins, a specification designed to combat inflation and simulate scarcity. As of 2023, more than 19 million Bitcoins have already been mined and are in circulation, giving the illusion that the limit is close to being reached. However, this is not exactly the case.

Periodic events known as "halvings" systematically reduce the rewards miners receive for adding new blocks to the blockchain, consequently slowing down the rate of new coin creation. This intricate design ensures that the final fractions of Bitcoin will only be mined around the year 2140, marking the end of the coin’s mining process.

Bitcoin’s Supply Ceiling: Why Only 21 Million Coins?

Bitcoin's supply constraint can be attributed to various considerations, the foremost of which is the desire to ward off inflation. The inherent scarcity of this digital asset is designed to maintain, or possibly increase, its value over the course of time.

So, why is the supply capped specifically at 21 million Bitcoins? Satoshi Nakamoto, the mysterious creator of Bitcoin, is believed to have envisioned that the value of 0.0001 BTC would equate to approximately 1 Euro. This implies that if Bitcoin were to supplant traditional fiat currencies, each of the 21 million Bitcoins would be equivalent to roughly one million USD.

The establishment of a fixed supply is a deliberate move to simulate the scarcity and deflationary nature of precious metals like gold, reinforcing its moniker as "digital gold." By mimicking characteristics of finite resources, Bitcoin aims to position itself as a store of value, resistant to the devaluation that conventional currencies can be subject to due to practices like overproduction and quantitative easing.

Moreover, this limited supply also fosters a sense of urgency and desire, potentially driving demand and, by extension, the value of Bitcoin upwards. As the asset becomes increasingly scarce, its perceived value may continue to escalate, fueled by the principles of supply and demand. In theory, the specified limit acts as a countermeasure to inflationary pressures, allowing Bitcoin to preserve—and potentially enhance—its purchasing power over time.

The choice of 21 million also serves as a meticulous balance, allowing enough granularity for microtransactions while sustaining scarcity. This calculated constraint ensures that Bitcoin remains a viable medium for transactions, both large and small, while preserving its deflationary nature and potential as a long-term investment.

Thus, the capping of Bitcoin at 21 million units is not arbitrary but rather a well-considered design aimed at ensuring its longevity, relevance, and stability in the financial ecosystem.

21 Million BTC Cap: A Look at Full Circulation Possibilities.

The unequivocal answer is ‘no,’ and there are several rationales to support this claim. First and foremost, a substantial amount of Bitcoins are presumed irretrievable, sealed in the wallets of individuals who have either lost their private keys or seed phrases or are deceased. Studies from 2020 suggest that nearly a fifth of all Bitcoins are potentially lost forever, a percentage that is likely to have escalated in the ensuing years. If these Bitcoins remain unrecovered, reaching the 21 million circulation mark is unattainable.

However, assuming ‘lost’ Bitcoins are still considered valid, projections indicate that we would nearly reach the 21 million milestone around the year 2140, marking the mining of the last Bitcoin, a consensus widely accepted by experts today.

The second impediment to mining 21 million Bitcoins is due to the rounding down of BTC fractions smaller than 1 Satoshi (0.00000001 BTC). This rounding down process brings the attainment of the 21 million mark into the realm of impossibility, although miners will approach this threshold very closely.

Given these circumstances, achieving a total circulation of 21 million Bitcoins seems improbable. The real-time scenario reveals about 15 million Bitcoins in circulation out of the 19 million that have been mined. This number is predicted to shrink further once the last block reward is dispensed to the miners' wallets, emphasizing the deflationary nature of Bitcoin and its inherent scarcity which is deemed to foster its value over time.

To add to these circumstances, the programmed halvings in Bitcoin's code, which reduce the block rewards for miners by half approximately every four years, exponentially decrease the rate at which new Bitcoins are created. This scarcity, combined with lost Bitcoins, means the circulating supply will always remain below the theoretical maximum limit, further reinforcing Bitcoin's value proposition as a store of value.

The Correlation between Bitcoin Scarcity and Its Valuation

The principle of scarcity stands out as a pivotal element in determining Bitcoin's sustained value. The limited availability of this cryptocurrency enhances the worth of each of its units. Nonetheless, it’s crucial to understand that scarcity alone does not dictate value. For instance, if you create a unique portrait, despite its scarcity, its value might not be comparable to Bitcoin's – scarcity coupled with demand drives true value.

Scarcity fuels the value of items and assets that are in high demand. The finite supply of Bitcoin, coupled with the reality that millions of Bitcoins are presumed lost due to irretrievable private keys, renders this coveted digital asset even more valuable. Nonetheless, scarcity isn't the sole variable affecting Bitcoin’s value; market demand, technological advancements, regulatory environment, and macroeconomic factors also play significant roles.

The Stock-to-Flow (S2F) model is a valuation model that has tried to forecast Bitcoin's future value focusing on scarcity, asserting that as Bitcoin becomes scarcer, its value will increase. This model has faced substantial criticism and skepticism, particularly as it predicted that by 2025, a single Bitcoin would be valued at $1 million. As of now, this seems overly optimistic and is not widely accepted as a plausible scenario in the current market conditions.

Moreover, the inherent value of Bitcoin also hinges on its utility, security, and adaptability. Its decentralized and secure blockchain technology, growing acceptance as a form of payment, and its potential as a hedge against inflation, all contribute to its overall value. The continuous development and improvements in the Bitcoin network also have a direct impact on its value, with advancements in scalability and sustainability acting as potential catalysts for price growth.

Consequently, while scarcity undeniably contributes to Bitcoin’s value, it is the interplay of multiple factors that collectively determine its price in the market. Balancing optimism with realism is essential when forecasting Bitcoin's future value, considering the ever-evolving landscape of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology.

What Happens After the Last of the 21 Million Bitcoins Is Mined?

When the point arrives where all Bitcoins have been mined, a significant shift will occur in the operational dynamics of the network. However, the fundamental process of mining will maintain its integral role in sustaining network functionality and security. Miners will transition from being rewarded with new Bitcoin to earning solely through transaction fees, which will serve as their continued incentive. Essentially, the network's foundational structure, rooted in the Proof-of-Work (PoW) protocol, will remain steadfast, with miners continuing to validate transactions and earn rewards. The shift will mainly revolve around the source of miners’ rewards.

Predicting the precise implications this will have on miners and the wider network is currently speculative, considering this scenario will materialize approximately in the year 2140. The future trajectory of Bitcoin, given its present criticisms related to its PoW energy consumption, remains speculative. There’s uncertainty surrounding Bitcoin’s status, whether it will retain its prevalence as a means of payment or a store of value, and how many Bitcoins will effectively be in circulation.

The evolving landscape of cryptocurrencies raises the possibility that new innovations and projects could overshadow Bitcoin by the time the last fractions of Bitcoin are mined. There are concerns within the expert community about potential adversarial strategies by miners to enhance their profits due to the absence of block rewards, such as the manipulation of transaction fees or engaging in 'selfish mining'. This form of mining involves malicious actors creating a fork in the network to conceal and subsequently release blocks, enabling them to misappropriate funds from other users.

However, it is crucial to approach these future speculations with a balanced perspective. Given the evolutionary pace of technology and shifts in global finance, Bitcoin's role and its operational dynamics could undergo unforeseen transformations. The development of new consensus algorithms, advancements in quantum computing, and potential shifts in global regulatory landscapes could all play pivotal roles in shaping Bitcoin's future existence and functionality. The decentralized finance (DeFi) sector and developments in blockchain technology will also likely impact Bitcoin’s utility and value perception in the forthcoming centuries.

This nuanced understanding of potential future developments underlines the importance of continuous observation and analysis of evolving trends and innovations within the cryptocurrency and blockchain space to better anticipate and adapt to the forthcoming phases of the digital asset ecosystem.


When contemplating the future scenarios of a world where all Bitcoins have been mined, our conjectures are fundamentally grounded in present circumstances and understandings. A myriad of unforeseen variables, both substantial and nuanced, are likely to play pivotal roles in sculpting the trajectory of Bitcoin in the upcoming decades, rendering our present day projections inherently speculative.

However, in an attempt to gaze into the distant future of Bitcoin, we are relegated to rely on historical data and current trends. Extrapolation of these provides us with a probable framework to interpret potential future states, albeit with inherent uncertainties.

The actual ramifications of mining the last Bitcoin are fundamentally unknown, and predictions vary widely. If the contextual circumstances surrounding the event mirror our contemporary world, the outcomes can range from the network maintaining its equilibrium (an optimistic prognosis), to miners resorting to detrimental practices in an effort to optimize their gains (a pessimistic outlook). Importantly, the overarching consensus is that the network will persist, albeit in altered forms, post the cessation of block rewards, with miners retaining sufficient incentives.

However, this transition period is anticipated to pose nuanced questions and challenges to the Bitcoin community, likely fostering innovations and adaptations within the network and broader blockchain ecosystem. The year 2140 and the associated cessation of Bitcoin mining rewards represent a mere fragment of the challenges and transformations the digital currency landscape is poised to undergo.

The evolving paradigms of decentralized finance, regulatory frameworks, and blockchain technologies will likely impose new dynamics and demands on Bitcoin and its community. The adaptive capacity of the network and its stakeholders, the evolution of cryptographic security in the age of quantum computing, and the emergence of new economic models and value systems are all variables that could significantly reshape the outlook and relevance of Bitcoin in a post-mining world.

Please note that Plisio also offers you:

Create Crypto Invoices in 2 Clicks and Accept Crypto Donations

12 integrations

6 libraries for the most popular programming languages

19 cryptocurrencies and 12 blockchains

Any questions?

It is hard to predict precisely, but losses, locked wallets, and unclaimed coins may significantly reduce the amount in active circulation.

Yes, advancements in technology and the emergence of new cryptocurrencies with enhanced features could potentially eclipse Bitcoin.

The scarcity is expected to increase its value; however, market dynamics, demand, and the cryptocurrency's evolution will determine its actual worth.

There are concerns that miners might employ malicious tactics to increase profits, such as "selfish mining", but it remains speculative.

Yes, Bitcoin can still be used as a currency for transactions, and its scarcity may enhance its value as a store of wealth.

The impact is uncertain, but some speculate that reliance on transaction fees may result in increased security risks or changes in miner behavior.

The last Bitcoin is predicted to be mined around the year 2140 due to halvings occurring approximately every four years.

It is anticipated that transaction fees will suffice as an incentive, though the economic landscape and Bitcoin's value at that time will greatly influence this.

No, Bitcoin’s network is designed to continue operating, allowing users to send and receive Bitcoins.

When the last Bitcoin is mined, miners will no longer receive block rewards but will continue to earn from transaction fees, maintaining network security and verifying transactions.